This walk-through checklist is provided to help school teams informally gauge their progress in implementing the Recommendation on rigor.
Check |
Evidence of recommendation implementation |
|
All adults use a variety of strategies to communicate to students high expectations for college and career. |
|
Schoolwide communications keep students and parents informed about high expectations. |
|
Grade-level standards and standards-based reporting are explained in school newsletters, Web pages, and to parents at meetings, through progress reports, e-mails, and phone calls. |
|
Hallways and classrooms feature examples of high-quality student writing, math, science, history, and creative projects with meaningful teacher commentary. |
|
Teachers work together to choose exemplars of student work that demonstrate grade-level proficiency. |
|
There is observable evidence that instructional commentary and timely feedback from teachers are not unique to some classrooms, but an expectation for all classrooms. |
|
Teachers post daily/weekly agendas in classrooms and on a Web pages; students use personal planners to stay organized. |
|
When asked, students and teachers can explain how the lessons or activities in which they are engaged will help them meet targeted standard(s). |
|
All students can explain what they must know and be able to do to meet the performance level required of the standard(s). |
|
Exemplars of previous student work with teacher commentary are posted in the classroom so that students know the expectations for quality work. |
|
There is observable evidence in student portfolios that students have received timely and meaningful feedback (“instructional commentary”) from their teacher that will assist them with revising their work. |
|
Students can explain how they use teacher feedback to revise their work until it meets or exceeds the proficient level. |
|
The campus has a high-quality library/media room and homework lab where students receive daily tutoring and have access before, during, and after school. |
|
Administrators, teachers, and counselors can explain independently the school’s numerous coordinated strategies to help each student achieve grade-level proficiency and academic literacy. |
|
There is evidence that the teachers scaffold the lessons with visuals, mind maps, graphic organizers, academic vocabulary, and other preparatory organizers. |
|
There is an articulated schoolwide plan to provide additional time and help each student learn when he or she cannot meet expectations and keep up with the rigorous curriculum. |
|
Intervention opportunities are accessible to every student during and beyond the school day. |
|
There is evidence from portfolios, pacing guides, and lesson plans that all teachers in a department are covering the breadth, depth, and rigor of grade-level standards. |
|
Teachers use current instructional materials adopted by the State Board of Education as the foundation for grade-level curriculum. |
|
Each student is provided with the materials necessary to complete high-quality work. |
|
Each classroom posts the day’s standard(s) on the board, and the lesson reflects the grade-level rigor expected of the standard. |
|
Rubrics for evaluating student performance levels are clearly visible and aligned to both the assignment and the standards. |